Senate
Committee on Foreign Relations, April 22, 1971
Thank you very much, Senator Fulbright, Senator Javits, Senator
Symington, Senator Pell. I would like to say for the record, and
also for the men behind me who are also wearing the uniforms and
their medals, that my sitting here is really symbolic. I am not
here as John Kerry. I am not here as John Kerry. I am here as
one member of the group of 1000, which is a small representation
of a much larger group of veterans in this country, and were it
possible for all of them to sit at this table, they would be here
and have the same kind of testimony.
I would simply like to speak in general terms. I apologize if
my statement is general because I received notification yesterday
you would hear me and I am afraid because of the injunction I
was up most of the night and haven’t had a great deal of
chance to prepare.
WINTER SOLDIER INVESTIGATION
I would like to talk, representing all those veterans, and say
that several months ago in Detroit, we had an investigation at
which over one hundred fifty honorably discharged and many very
highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in
Southeast Asia, not isolated incidents, but crimes committed on
a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all
levels of command.
It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in
Detroit, the emotions in the room, the feelings of the men who
were reliving their experiences in Vietnam, but they did. They
relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense,
made them do.
They told stories that at times they had personally raped, cut
off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones
to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown
up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion
reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned
food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam
in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very
particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power
of this country.
We call this investigation the “Winter Soldier Investigation.”
The term “Winter Soldier” is a play on words of Thomas
Paine in 1776 when he spoke of the Sunshine Patriot and summertime
soldiers who deserted at Valley Forge because the going was rough.
We who have come here to Washington have come here because we
feel we have to be winter soldiers now. We could come back to
this country; we could be quiet; we could hold our silence; we
could not tell what went on in Vietnam, but we feel because of
what threatens this country, the fact that the crimes threaten
it, not reds, and not redcoats, but the crimes which we are committing
that threaten it, that we have to speak out.
FEELING OF MEN COMING BACK FROM VIETNAM
I would like to talk to you a little bit about what the result
is of the feelings these men carry with them after coming back
from Vietnam. The country doesn’t know it yet, but it has
created a monster, a monster in the form of millions of men who
have been taught to deal and to trade in violence, and who are
given the chance to die for the biggest nothing in history; men
who have returned with a sense of anger and a sense of betrayal
which no one has yet grasped.
As a veteran and one who feels this anger, I would like to talk
about it. We are angry because we feel we have been used in the
worst fashion by the administration of this country.
In 1970 at West Point, Vice President Agnew said “Some
glamorize the criminal misfits of society while our best men die
in Asian rice paddies to preserve the freedom which most of those
misfits abuse,” and this was used as a rallying point for
our effort in Vietnam.
But for us, as boys in Asia whom the country was supposed to
support, his statement is a terrible distortion from which we
can only draw a very deep sense of revulsion. Hence the anger
of some of the men who are here in Washington today. It is a distortion
because we in no way consider ourselves the best men of this country,
because those he calls misfits were standing up for us in a way
that nobody else in this country dared to, because so many who
have died would have returned to this country to join the misfits
in their efforts to ask for an immediate withdrawal from South
Vietnam, because so many of those best men have returned as quadriplegics
and amputees, and they lie forgotten in Veterans Administration
Hospitals in this country which fly the flag which so many have
chosen as their own personal symbol. And we cannot consider ourselves
America’s best men when we are ashamed of and hated what
we were called on to do in Southeast Asia.
In our opinion, and from our experience, there is nothing in
South Vietnam, nothing which could happen that realistically threatens
the United States of America. And to attempt to justify the loss
of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia, or Laos by linking
such loss to the preservation of freedom, which those misfits
supposedly abuse, is to us the height of criminal hypocrisy, and
it is that kind of hypocrisy which we feel has torn this country
apart.
We are probably much more angry than that, and I don’t
want to go into the foreign policy aspects because I am outclassed
here. I know that all of you talk about every possible alternative
of getting out of Vietnam. We understand that. We know you have
considered the seriousness of the aspects to the utmost level
and I am not going to try to dwell on that, but I want to relate
to you the feeling that many of the men who have returned to this
country express because we are probably angriest about all that
we were told about Vietnam and about the mystical war against
communism.
WHAT WAS FOUND AND LEARNED IN VIETNAM
We found that not only was it a civil war, an effort by a people
who had for years been seeking their liberation from any colonial
influence whatsoever, but also we found that the Vietnamese whom
we had enthusiastically molded after our own image were hard put
to take up the fight against the threat we were supposedly saving
them from.
We found most people didn’t even know the difference between
communism and democracy. They only wanted to work in rice paddies
without helicopters strafing them and bombs with napalm burning
their villages and tearing their country apart. They wanted everything
to do with the war, particularly with this foreign presence of
the United States of America, to leave them alone in peace, and
they practiced the art of survival by siding with whichever military
force was present at a particular time, be it Vietcong, North
Vietnamese, or American.
We found also that all too often American men were dying in those
rice paddies for want of support from their allies. We saw firsthand
how money from American taxes were used for a corrupt dictatorial
regime. We saw that many people in this country had a one-sided
idea of who was kept free by our flag, as blacks provided the
highest percentage of casualties. We saw Vietnam ravaged equally
by American bombs as well as by search-and-destroy missions, as
well as by Vietcong terrorism, and yet we listened while this
country tried to blame all of the havoc on the Vietcong.
We rationalized destroying villages in order to save them. We
saw America lose her sense of morality as she accepted very coolly
a My Lai and refused to give up the image of American soldiers
who hand out chocolate bars and chewing gum.
We learned the meaning of free fire zones, shooting anything
that moves, and we watched while America placed a cheapness on
the lives of Orientals.
We watched the U.S. falsification of body counts, in fact the
glorification of body counts. We listened while month after month
we were told the back of the enemy was about to break. We fought
using weapons against “Oriental human beings,” with
quotation marks around that. We fought using weapons against those
people which I do not believe this country would dream of using
were we fighting in the European theater, or let us say a non-third-world
people theater, and so we watched while men charged up hills because
a general said that hill has to be taken, and after losing one
platoon or two platoons, they marched away to leave the high for
the reoccupation by the North Vietnamese because we watched pride
allow the most unimportant battles to be blown into extravaganzas,
because we couldn’t lose, and we couldn’t retreat,
and because it didn’t matter how many American bodies were
lost to prove that point. And so there were Hamburger Hills and
Khe Sanhs and Hill 881’s and Fire Base 6’s and so
many others.
Now we are told that the men who fought there must watch quietly
while American lives are lost so that we can exercise the incredible
arrogance of Vietnamizing the Vietnamese.
Each day …
[APPLAUSE]
CHAIRMAN. I hope you won’t interrupt. He is making a very
significant statement. Let him proceed.
KERRY. Each day to facilitate the process by which the United
States washes her hands of Vietnam someone has to give up his
life so that the United States doesn’t have to admit something
that the entire world already knows, so that we can’t say
that we have made a mistake. Someone has to die so that President
Nixon won’t be, and these are his words, “the first
president to lose a war.”
We are asking Americans to think about that because: how do you
ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam? How do you ask
a man to be the last man to die for a mistake? But we are trying
to do that, and we are doing it with thousands of rationalizations,
and if you read carefully the president’s last speech to
the people of this country, you can see that he says, and says
clearly: “But the issue, gentlemen, the issue is communism,
and the question is whether or not we will leave that country
to the communists or whether or not we will try to give it hope
to be a free people.” But the point is they are not a free
people now under us. They are not a free people, and we cannot
fight communism all over the world, and I think we should have
learned that lesson by now.
RETURNING VETERANS ARE NOT REALLY WANTED
But the problem of veterans goes beyond this personal problem,
because you think about a poster in this country with a picture
of Uncle Sam and the picture says, “I want you.” And
a young man comes out of high school and says, “That is
fine. I am going to serve my country.” And he goes to Vietnam
and he shoots and he kills and he does his job or maybe he doesn’t
kill, maybe he just goes and he comes back, and when he gets back
to this country he finds that he isn’t really wanted, because
the largest unemployment figure in the country - it varies depending
on whom you get it from, the VA Administration 15 percent, various
other sources 22 percent. But the largest corps of unemployed
in this country are veterans of this war, and of those veterans
33 percent of the unemployed are black. That means 1 out of every
10 of the Nation’s unemployed is a veteran of Vietnam.
The hospitals across the country won’t or can’t meet
their demands. It is not a question of not trying. They haven’t
got the appropriations. A man recently died after he had a tracheotomy
in California, not because of the operation, but because there
weren’t enough personnel to clean the mucus out of his tube
and he suffocated to death.
Another young man just died in a New York VA hospital the other
day. A friend of mine was lying in a bed two beds away and tried
to help him, but he couldn’t. He rang a bell and there was
nobody there to service that man and so he died of convulsions.
I understand 57 percent of all those entering the VA hospitals
talk about suicide. Some 27 percent have tried, and they try because
they come back to this country and they have to face what they
did in Vietnam, and then they come back and find the indifference
of a country that doesn’t really care, that doesn’t
really care.
LACK OF MORAL INDIGNATION IN UNITED STATES
Suddenly we are faced with a very sickening situation in this
country, because there is no moral indignation and, if there is,
it comes from people who are almost exhausted by their past indignations,
and I know that many of them are sitting in front of me. The country
seems to have lain down and shrugged off something as serious
as Laos, just as we calmly shrugged off the loss of 700,000 lives
in Pakistan, the so-called greatest disaster of all time.
But we are here as veterans to say that we think we are in the
midst of the greatest disaster of all time now because they are
still dying over there, and not just Americans, Vietnamese, and
we are rationalizing leaving that country so that those people
can go on killing each other for years to come. Americans seem
to have accepted the idea that the war is winding down, at least
for Americans, and they have also allowed the bodies which were
once used by a president for statistics to prove that we were
winning that war, to be used as evidence against a man who followed
orders and who interpreted those orders no differently than hundreds
of other men in Vietnam.
We veterans can only look with amazement on the fact that this
country has been unable to see there is absolutely no difference
between ground troops and a helicopter crew, and yet people have
accepted a differentiation fed them by the administration.
No ground troops are in Laos, so it is all right to kill Laotians
by remote control. But believe me, the helicopter crews fill the
same body bags and they wreak the same kind of damage on the Vietnamese
and Laotian countryside as anybody else, and the president is
talking about allowing that to go on for many years to come. One
can only ask if we will really be satisfied only when the troops
march into Hanoi.
REQUEST FOR ACTION BY CONGRESS
We are asking here in Washington for some action, action from
the Congress of the United States of America, which has the power
to raise and maintain armies, and which, by the Constitution also
has the power to declare war.
We have come here, not to the president, because we believe that
this body can be responsive to the will of the people, and we
believe that the will of the people says that we should be out
of Vietnam now.
EXTENT OF PROBLEM OF VIETNAM WAR
We are here in Washington also to say that the problem of this
war is not just a question of war and diplomacy. It is part and
parcel of everything that we are trying as human beings to communicate
to people in this country, the question of racism, which is rampant
in the military, and so many other questions also, the use of
weapons, the hypocrisy in our taking umbrage in the Geneva Conventions
and using that as justification for a continuation of this war,
when we are more guilty than any other body of violations of those
Geneva Conventions, in the use of free fire zones, harassment
interdiction fire, search and destroy missions, the bombings,
the torture of prisoners, the killing of prisoners, accepted policy
by many units in South Vietnam. That is what we are trying to
say. It is part and parcel of everything.
An American-Indian friend of mine who lives in the Indian Nation
of Alcatraz put it to me very succinctly. He told me how as a
boy on an Indian reservation he had watched television and he
used to cheer the cowboys when they came in and shot the Indians,
and then suddenly one day he stopped in Vietnam and he said, “My
God, I am doing to these people the very same thing that was done
to my people.” And he stopped. And that is what we are trying
to say, that we think this thing has to end.
WHERE IS THE LEADERSHIP?
We are also here to ask, and we are here to ask vehemently, where
are the leaders of our country? Where is the leadership? We are
here to ask where McNamara, Rostow, Bundy, Gilpatric, and so many
others. Where are they now that we, the men whom they sent off
to war, have returned? These are commanders who have deserted
their troops, and there is no more serious crime in the law of
war. The Army says they never leave their wounded.
The Marines say they never leave even their dead. These men have
left all the casualties and retreated behind a pious shield of
public rectitude. They have left the real stuff of their reputations
bleaching behind them in the sun in this country.
ADMINISTRATION’S ATTEMPT TO DISOWN VETERANS
Finally, this administration has done us the ultimate dishonor.
They have attempted to disown us and the sacrifice we made for
this country. In their blindness and fear they have tried to deny
that we are veterans or that we served in Nam. We do not need
their testimony. Our own scars and stumps of limbs are witnesses
enough for others and for ourselves.
We wish that a merciful God could wipe away our own memories
of that service as easily as this administration has wiped their
memories of us. But all that they have done and all that they
can do by this denial is to make more clear than ever our own
determination to undertake one last mission, to search out and
destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war, to pacify our own
hearts, to conquer the hate and the fear that have driven this
country these last 10 years and more. And so when, in 30 years
from now, our brothers go down the street without a leg, without
an arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able to
say, “Vietnam” and not mean a desert, not a filthy
obscene memory, but mean instead the place where America finally
turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning.
Thank you.
John Kerry