Link to Online Textbook Link to the Boisterous Sea of Liberty Link to Historic Court Cases Link to Historic Newspapers Link to Landmark Documents Link to Classroom Handouts Link to Lesson Plans Link to Resource Guides ink to E-lectures Link to Film Trailers Link to Flash Movies Link to Multimedia Exhibits Link to Ethnic America Link to Materials for Teachers Link to eXplorations Link to Learning Modules Link to Interactive Timeline Link to Games Database Link to A House Divided Link to America's Reconstruction Link to Virtual Exhibitions Link to Current Controversies Link to Ethnic America Link to Film and History Link to Historiography Link to Private Life Link to Science and Technology Link to the Reference Room Link to Writing Guides Link to Biographies Link to Book Talks Link to Chronologies Link to the Encyclopedia Link to Glossaries Link to the History Profession Link to Historical Images Link to Historical Maps Link to eXplorations Link to Do History through... Link to Multimedia Link to Historical Music Link to Museums & Archives Link to Historic Music Link to Historic Speeches Link to Historical Websites Link to Social History section

 

Back to Classroom-tested Lesson Plans and Handouts

Religion, Race, and Gender in Revolutionary America

Religion | Race | Gender

Religion Primary Sources | Race Primary Sources | Gender Primary Sources


Religion

Essential points:

1. The American colonies were settled by people of deep religious convictions who crossed the Atlantic to escape religious persecution and practice their faith freely. New England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland were founded for religious reasons.

2. The Great Awakening of the 1730s and '40s, the first event shared by all the colonists, promoted the growth of the Presbyterian, Baptist, and Methodist churches. It convinced many Americans that God works directly through the people and that Christ's Second Coming was rapidly approaching.

3. Religion contributed greatly to the Revolution. Many clergy pictured the Church of England as a dangerous, almost diabolical, enemy of American freedom and argued that resistance to tyranny was a Christian duty.

4. Both the central and state governments were convinced that morality and national survival depended upon religion. But there was also a growing belief that government and the churches should be separate. Intense debate erupted over the propriety of government providing tax support to an established church or indeed to any churches.

5. The Revolution gave rise to the American System of religious pluralism:

Churches were disestablished, that is, they lost tax support.
Concern about Deism and skepticism led Evangelicals and others to band together to ensure that the United States remained a godly nation. Through camp meetings, religious revivals, and moral reform, revivalists and reformers sought to save souls and save the republic.

Religion and the Constitution

U.S. Constitution, Article VI: "No religious Test shall ever be required as Qualification" for federal office holders.

The 1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

1. Did the Constitution's framers intended to build the 'wall of separation' between church and state?

  • Does the separation of church and state mean that prayer and moments of silence should not be allowed in public schools?
  • Does the separation of church and state allow for clergy to participate in graduation ceremonies?
  • Can religious displays appear on public property?

2. What does freedom of religion mean?

  • Does it mean that members of particular religious sects do not have to say the Pledge of Allegiance in school or that they can practice polygamy?
  • Does the separation of church and state allow individuals to bring religious items into the workplace or school classroom?

Back to Top


Race

Essential Points:

1. The Revolutionary Era transformed slavery into a moral problem.

2. The colonists were convinced that the British Parliament was seeking to reduce them to political slavery, and it proved impossible to ignore the parallel between political slavery and chattel slavery.

3. The First Continental Congress called on the colonies to end the international slave trade. Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, North and South Carolina, and Virginia did so.

4. African American soldiers served with valor at the battles of Lexington and Bunker Hill. In November 1775, however, Congress decided to exclude blacks from future enlistment out of a sensitivity to the opinion of southern slaveholders. But in 1775, the royal governor of Virginia offered to emancipate slaves who joined the Royal Army. Lord Dunmore's offer of freedom led Congress reluctantly to reverse it decision, fearful that black soldiers might join the redcoats.

5. The Revolution was highly disruptive to the institution of slavery. A third of the slaves in Georgia and a quarter of the slaves in South Carolina escaped during the fighting. Free blacks became the fastest growing portion of the population.

6. As a result of the Revolution, slavery was transformed into a purely sectional institution. When the war was over, the New England and Middle Atlantic states abolished slavery by legislative or judicial action or adopted gradual emancipation schemes. Still, as late as 1810 there were more than 30,000 slaves in the northern states.

7. The Northwest Ordinance outlawed slavery in the west north of the Ohio.

8. The late 18th century witnessed the emergence of pseudo-scientific racism.

1. Was the Constitution a Pro- or Anti-Slavery Document?

  • The original Constitution never mentions the word slavery.
  • Nevertheless, slavery was debated from the first day of substantive debates until the last and led to numerous explosions.
  • The Constitution gave Congress the power to enact a fugitive slave law; power to put down uprisings.
  • There were only two unamendable provisions of the Constitution. One guaranteed states a republican form of government; the other forbade legislation restricting the slave trade until 1808
  • The 3/5s Compromised enhanced Southern power in the House of Representatives and the electoral college. In 1820, it gave the southern states an additional 20 representatives.
  • Politically, the Revolution strengthened the slave South, since there was no all-powerful Parliament to abolish slavery. But the Revolution also created a radical egalitarian ideology that undermined the legitimacy of slavery

2. What was the status of free blacks after the Revolution?

  • The post-Revolutionary military excluded blacks
  • Early naturalization laws limited the process to whites only
  • Until the 1820s, blacks could not carry the federal mail or hold elective office in the District of Columbia.
  • Every new state denied free blacks the vote; most did not allow free blacks to serve on juries or testify in cases involving whites.
  • Many states (including Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, and Oregon) and territories (including Michigan) barred free blacks from residence or required substantial bonds before they could enter.
  • While the Northwest Ordinance forbade slavery it did not prohibit long-term "apprenticeships."
  • Before 1820, free black men in Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Maine, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire could vote. They lost that right in New Jersey, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania before the Civil War.
  • A few blacks received passports to travel abroad under the aegis of the United States during the 1840s and 1850s.
  • In 1823 the Supreme Court declared state laws imprisoning free black sailors while their ships were in port unconstitutional. (Despite this ruling, several southern states continued the practice until the Civil War.)
  • It was not until enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868 that black citizenship was finally guaranteed. Although these guarantees did not ensure the protection of their constitutional rights, African Americans were at last irrefutably American citizens.

Back to Top


Gender: Women

Essential Points:

1. The Revolutionary era had contradictory effects on the status of women.

2. Women assumed unaccustomed responsibilities during the Revolution. But the Revolution also created thousands of widows and single mothers. Older mechanisms for caring for the poor were overburdened. To cope with the burden, states and cities created almshouses, orphan asylums, and other institutions.

3. The Revolutionary generation assigned new significance to women's roles. Republican mothers were responsible for shaping society's moral character. Women needed to be educated and literacy rocketed upward.

4. Women received new ways to contribute to their family's income, through household industries, early factories, teaching and writing. Women also became active in charitable and reform societies.

5. Older notion of coverture gave way as women gained increased rights to divorce and custody of children.

6. Women also gained freer choice in marriage and began to limit births.

7. More negatively, the Revolutionary era accentuated the political and economic differences between men and women. The Revolutionary generation spoke of the rights of man. Women were denied access to the vote, to higher education, and to the professions.

Women and the Constitution

1. The Constitution speaks of "persons"; only rarely does the document use the word "he."

2. Women were NOT explicitly excluded from Congress or from the Presidency or from juries or from voting.

3. Although taxation without representation had been a rallying cry of the Revolution, single women and widows who owned property paid taxes although they could not vote for the legislators who set the taxes (except, temporarily, in New Jersey).

  • A double standard of morals was maintained in law, by which women were arrested for prostitution while men went free.
  • Under the legal doctrine of coverture, upon marriage, a woman's identity was assumed ("covered") by her husband. Thus she could not sue or be sued, make contracts, or earn wages.

4. The 14th Amendment included a clause that stated: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."

In the presidential election of 1872, supporters of woman suffrage, including Susan B. Anthony, appeared at the polls, arguing that if all citizens had the right to the privileges of citizenship, they could certainly exercise the right to vote.

In Minor v. Happersett (1875) the Supreme Court ruled that women could only receive the vote as a result of explicit legislation or constitutional amendment, rather than by interpretation of the implications of the Constitution. In a unanimous opinion, the Court observed that it was "too late" to claim the right of suffrage by implication.

Back to Top


Religion

Reading 1:

Well aware that Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burdens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness…. To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical; that even the forcing him to support this or that teacher of his own religious persuasion, is depriving him of the comfortable liberty of giving his contributions to the particular pastor whose morals he would make his pattern, and whose powers he feels most persuasive to righteousness, and is withdrawing from the ministry those temporal rewards, which proceeding from an approbation of their personal conduct, are an additional incitement to earnest and unremitting labors for the instruction of mankind; that our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, more than our opinions in physics or geometry; that, therefore, the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to the offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages to which in common with his fellow citizens he has a natural right….

Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom, 1786

Reading 2:

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore man to all of his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

Thomas Jefferson, January 1, 1802

Back to Top


Slavery & Race

Reading 1:

The petition of A Great Number of Blackes detained in a State of slavery in the Bowels of a free & Christian Country Humbly shuwith [showeth] that your Petitioners apprehend that thay [they] have in Common with all other men a Natural and Unaliable [inalienable] Right to that freedom which the Grat Parent of the Unavers hath Bestowed equalley on all menkind and which they have Never forfuted by any Compact or agreement whatever-but thay wher Unjustly Dragged by the hand of cruel Power from their Derest friends and sum of them Even torn from the Embraces of their tender Parents-from A popolous Pleasant and plentiful contry and in violation of Laws of Nature and off Nations and in defiance of all the tender feelings of humanity Brough hear Either to Be sold Like Beast of Burthen & Like them Condemnd to Slavery for Life-Among A People Profesing the mild Religion of Jesus A people Not Insensible of the Secrets of Rational Being Nor without spirit to Resent the unjust endeavours of others to Reduce them to a state of Bondage and Subjection your honouer Need not to be informed that A Life of Slavery Like that of your petioners Deprived of Every social privilege of Every thing Requisit to Render Life Tolable is far worse then Nonexistence.

Petition to the Massachusetts Legislature, 1777

Reading 2:

Lend an ear to the poor oppressed African Blacks that are now in the Chaine[s] of Bondage - Gentlemen please to give The Leave to Give a little Idea of the Cruelties that we Poore Slaves have to endure and undergo…. Gentlemen we are Dragged from our native Country for Life…Leaving our mothers our farthers our Sisters and our Brothers….Further more gentlemen after we have…fought the grandest Battles that has Been fought in this War the greatest part of us - We and our children and our Brothers are taken By force of violence and carried where…we are Beaten…without any Law…. Is this…Right and just…? No, it is murder….

Petition to the Connecticut General Assembly, 1788

George Washington:

There is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of it…. But when slaves who are happy & content to remain with their present masters, are tampered with & seduced to leave them… it introduces more evils than it can cure."

Complaining about a Quaker antislavery society, April 12, 1786

To liberate a certain species of property which I possess very repugnantly to my own feelings, but which imperious necessity compels, and until I can substitute some other expedient by which expenses not in my power to avoid (however well disposed I may be to do it) can be defrayed.

Washington hoped to rent or sell part of his land so that he could allow his slave to work as free laborers; he was unable to find a suitable renter, 1793

To sell the overplus I cannot, because I am principled against this kind of traffic in the human species. To hire them out is almost as bad, because they could not be disposed of in families to any advantage, and to disperse the families I have an aversion.What then is to be done? Something must or I shall be ruined…"

Washington felt he had too many slaves, but felt it would be immoral to sell any, 1799

John Adams:

There is one Resolution I will not omit. Resolved that no Slaves be imported into any of the thirteen colonies.

Discussing trade resolutions before the Continental Congress, 1776

I shudder when I think of the calamities which slavery is likely to produce in this country. You would think me mad if I were to describe my anticipations…If the gangrene is not stopped I can see nothing but insurrection of the blacks against the whites.

1820

Benjamin Franklin:

If we forbear to make Slaves of their People, who in this hot Climate are to cultivate our Lands? Who are to perform the common Labours of our City, and in our Families? Must we not then be our own Slaves? And is there not more Compassion and more Favour due to us as Mussulmen, than to these Christian Dogs? We have now about 50,000 Slaves in and near Algiers. This Number, if not kept up by fresh Supplies, will soon diminish, and be gradually annihilated. If we then cease taking and plundering the Infidel Ships, and making Slaves of the Seamen and Passengers, our Lands will become of no Value for want of Cultivation; the Rents of Houses in the City will sink one half; and the Revenues of Government arising from its Share of Prizes be totally destroy'd! And for what? To gratify the whims of a whimsical Sect, who would have us, not only forbear making more Slaves, but even to manumit those we have.

A parody of apologies for slavery, in which a Barbary pirate defends the seizure of Christians as slaves, 1790.

From a persuasion that equal liberty was originally the Portion, & is still the Birthright of all men, & influenced by the strong ties of Humanity & the Principles of their Institution, your Memorialists conceive themselves bound to use all justifiable endeavours to loosen the bands of Slavery and promote a general Enjoyment of the blessings of Freedom. Under these Impressions they earnestly entreat your serious attention to the Subject of Slavery, that you will be pleased to countenance the Restoration of liberty to those unhappy men, who alone, in this land of Freedom, are degraded into perpetual Bondage, and who, amidst the general Joy of surrounding Freemen, are groaning in Servile Subjection, that you will devise means for removing this Inconsistency from the Character of the American People, that you will promote Mercy and Justice towards this distressed Race, & that you will Step to the very verge of the Powers vested in you for discouraging every Species of Traffick in the Persons of our fellow Men.

Petition to Congress on behalf of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society, 1790

Alexander Hamilton:

The laws of certain states …give an ownership in the service of negroes as personal property…. But being men, by the laws of God and nature, they were capable of acquiring liberty….

Alexander Hamilton, 1795

James Madison:

Establishing a Settlement of freed blacks on the Coast of Africa... might prove a great encouragement to manumission in the Southern parts of the U.S. and even afford the best hope yet presented of putting an end to the slavery in which not less than 600,000 unhappy negroes are now involved. In all the Southern States of N. America, the laws permit masters, under certain precautions to manumit their slaves. But the continuance of such a permission in some of the States is rendered precarious by the ill effects suffered from freedmen who retain the vices and habits of slaves. The same consideration becomes an objection with many humane masters against an exertion of their legal rights of freeing their slaves.

1789

A general emancipation of slaves ought to be 1. gradual. 2. equitable & satisfactory to the individuals immediately concerned. 3. consistent with the existing & durable prejudices of the nation... To be consistent with existing and probably unalterable prejudices in the U.S. freed blacks ought to be permanently removed beyond the region occupied by or alloted to a White population.

1819

Thomas Jefferson:

[King George III] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another

From draft of the Declaration of Independence, 1776

It will probably be asked, Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state…? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousands recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race."

Discussing his 1777 proposal which would have eventually freed slaves in Virginia and deported them.

I advance it therefore as a suspicion only, that the blacks, whether originally a distinct race, or made distinct by time and circumstances, are inferior to the whites in the endowments both of body and mind…..

There must doubtless be an unhappy influence on the manners of our people produced by the existence of slavery among us. The whole commerce between master and slave is a perpetual exercise of the most boisterous passions, the most unremitting despotism on the one part, and degrading submissions on the other. Our children see this, and learn to imitate it; for man is an imitative animal. This quality is the germ of all education in him. From his cradle to his grave he is learning to do what he sees others do.

... Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that considering numbers, nature and natural means only, a revolution of the wheel of fortune, an exchange of situation, is among possible events: that it may become probable by supernatural interference The Almighty has no attribute which can take side with us in such a contest.

Notes on the State of Virginia, 1780

We have the wolf by the ears and we can neither hold him nor safely let him go. Justice is in one scale and self-preservation in the other.

1820

To send off the whole of these at once, nobody conceives to be practicable for us, or expedient for them. Let us take twenty-five years for its accomplishment, within which time they will be doubled. Their estimated value as property…must be paid or lost by somebody."

Jefferson proposes to deport slave children over a period of 25 years, 1824

Back to Top


Women

Reading 1:

In the new Code of Laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make I desire you would Remember the Ladies, and be more generous and favourable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the Husbands. Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the Laidies we are determined to foment a Rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any Laws in which we have no voice, or Representation.

Reading 2:

That your Sex are Naturally Tyrannical is a Truth so thoroughly established as to admit of no dispute Why then, not put it out of the power of the vicious and the Lawless to use us with cruelty and indignity with impunity

Abigail Adams to John Adams, March 31, 1776

Reading 3:

As to your extraordinary Code of Laws, I cannot but laugh. We have been told that our Struggle has loosened the bands of Government every where. That Children and Apprentices were disobedient--that schools and Colledges were grown turbulent--that Indians slighted their Guardians and Negroes grew insolent to their Masters. But your Letter was the first Intimation that another Tribe more numerous and powerfull than all the rest were grown discontented Depend upon it, We know better than to repeal our Masculine systems We have only the Name of Masters. and rather than give up this, which would compleatly subject Us to the Despotism of the Peticoat, I hope General Washington, and all our brave Heroes would fight.

John Adams to Abigail Adams, April 14, 1776

Reading 4:

The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life. The constitution of the family organization, which is founded on the divine ordinance, as well as in the nature of things, indicates the domestic sphere as that which properly belongs the domain and functions of womanhood. The harmony, not to say identity, of interests and views which belong or should belong to the family institution, is repugnant to the idea of a woman adopting a distinct and-independent career from that of her husband. So firmly fixed was this sentiment in the founders of the common law that it became a maxim of that system of jurisprudence that a woman had no legal existence separate from her husband, who was regarded as her head and representative in the social state . many of the special rules of law flowing from and dependent upon this cardinal principle still exist in full force in most states. One of these is that a married woman is incapable, without her husband's consent, of making contracts which shall be binding on her or him. This very incapacity was one circumstance which the supreme court of Illinois deemed important in rendering a married woman incompetent fully to perform the duties and trusts that belong to the office of an attorney and counselor.

Myra Bradwell v. State of Illinois, 1873

Reading 5:

For nearly ninety years the people have acted upon the idea that the Constitution, when it conferred citizenship, did not necessarily confer the right of suffrage. If uniform practice long continued can settle the construction of so important an instrument as the Constitution of the United States confessedly is, most certainly it has been done here. Our province is to decide what the law is, not to declare what it should be.

Minor v. Happersett, 1875

Reading 6:

And now, at the, close of a hundred years, as the hour-hand of the great clock that marks the centuries points to 1876, we declare our faith in the principles of self-government; our full equality with man in natural rights; that woman was made first for her own happiness, with the absolute right to herself--to all the opportunities and advantages life affords for her complete development; and we deny that dogma of the centuries, incorporated in the codes of all nations--that woman was made for man--her best interests . to be sacrificed to his will. We ask of our rulers, at this hour, no special privileges, no special legislation. We ask justice, we ask equality, we ask that all the civil and political rights that belong to citizens of the United States be guaranteed to us and our daughters forever.

Susan B. Anthony, 1876

Back to Top

 

 

 

This site was updated on 17-Apr-14.

Link to Ask the Hyperhistorian Link to Send Us Comments Link to Search & Site Map