Printable Version
The Debate Over Big Business |
Previous |
Next |
Digital History ID 3169
|
A great debate over big business took place during late 19th
century. Among the issues that Americans debated was:
- whether wealth came from exploitation or from patience,
frugality, and virtue;
- whether bigness was the result of conspiracy or of pressures
of blind economic forces;
- whether men of wealth and power were free to use their riches
as they wish or whether they should be taxed to support the
public good.
Henry Demarest Lloyd, a precursor for the muckraking journalists
of the Progressive Era, considered the lords of industry monopolists
and profiteers, who blocked the road to success for
those who tried to compete with them. Others, like Edward Atkinson,
a successful investor and businessman, asserted that the great
business titans made all Americans better off through their innovations
in management, finance, and production. Lloyd and Atkinson helped
set the terms for a long lasting public debate: Were the business
leaders of the Gilded Age robber barons or creative industrial
pioneers?
There can be no doubt that the late 19th century business
titans were business innovators, who, through their technical,
administrative, and financial skills, achieved economies of scale,
eliminated waste, and brought order and stability to large sectors
of the American economy. In large part, their wealth was the product
of innovations that transformed business practice. Rockefeller
developed the oil tank-car; Swift the refrigerated rail car; and
Montgomery Ward the mail-order catalog. As philanthropists in
later life, some also served important welfare and educational
functions.
But big business' critics accused the captains of industry
of financial trickery, such as cornering and watering stock, and
of political corruption and the bribing of legislatures. They
attacked them for the inhumane treatment of labor--including the
imposition of heavy hours, wage cuts, lockouts and the suppression
of trade unions. They also condemned them for using cheap immigrant
contract labor to undercut wage rates and defeat strikes, as well as for imposing monopoly prices. Above all, they were condemned as sinister
monopolists who engaged in ruthless competition - choking off rivals
by use of railroad rebates and kickbacks, control of raw material
supplies, industrial espionage, and the forced purchase of competing
firms.
Many people likened J.P. Morgan, Jay Gould, and other
business leaders to the "robber barons" of the Middle
Ages, who set up barriers across rivers and forced boats to pay
a toll in order to navigate the waterways. A U.S. Senator described
Morgan as a "thick-necked financial bully, drunk with wealth
and power, [who] bawls his orders to stock markets, Directors,
courts, Governments, and Nations."
Copyright 2021 Digital History
|