Digital
History>eXplorations>Lynching>Anti-Lynching
Legislation of the 1920s>Moorfield Storey to William
Borah
Moorfield Storey's Letter to Senator William Borah (June 5, 1922)
Source:
NAACP Papers, Library of Congress
…
It is a disgrace to this country for the Senate to say that not
only that this bill is bad, but that the power to pass a good
bill does not exist. This is practically saying to the colored
People of the United States, "You can be murdered, burned
and robbed with absolute impunity and this country which uses
you as soldiers and taxes you as citizens cannot help you".
Are you prepared to say this? I fancy that if the question whether
the Fourteenth amendment would justify the legislation which we
ask for were presented to you as a new question, you would agree
with me, but you feel bound by the decisions which the Supreme
Court of the United States has rendered on substantially different
questions. My feeling is that the Senate of the United States
has a right to construe this amendment for itself and to challenge
the Supreme Court of the United States to change its position.
If
sitting on the Supreme Court and dealing with this question as
a new question, you would insist that there was no power of the
Federal Government to protect the colored people, I could not
quarrel with your speaking and voting accordingly, nor would I
for a moment suggest that you should vote against your conscientious
convictions. But your feeling in this matter is an opinion on
a doubtful question of law, and in such cases no lawyer violate
his conscience by putting the question in the way of being settled
by the highest court. I feel that you ought not to be so sure
that you are right as not to do this. If I understand your position
you feel that some such law against lynching ought to be enacted,
but question the power to pass it. Your proposed action destroys
the chance of having such a law, because you are sure that you
are right on a doubtful question. For Heaven's sake, do not tell
the negroes that their case is hopeless, that this great country
cannot protect them from absolute wanton murder with the connivance
and of ten with the assistance of the officers appointed by law
to defend them, and with absolute indifference on the part of
the United States.
|